Is the PH Provoking China? China Accuses PH Air Patrol of Stirring Trouble

The Philippines (PH), a Southeast Asian country, has been conducting air patrols over the South China Sea (SCS), a disputed and strategic waterway, where it claims sovereignty and rights over some islands and features, such as the Spratly Islands and the Scarborough Shoal. The PH air patrols, which involve military aircraft and personnel, are aimed to assert and defend the PH’s territorial and maritime interests, and to monitor and deter any illegal or provocative activities by other claimants, especially China.

The PH air patrols have also been joined and supported by the United States (US), the PH’s treaty ally and security partner, who has been conducting freedom of navigation and overflight operations in the SCS, to challenge and counter China’s expansive and aggressive claims and actions. The US and the PH have also held joint exercises and patrols in the SCS, to enhance their interoperability and cooperation, and to demonstrate their commitment and solidarity.

The Reaction of China to the PH Air Patrol

China, a rising and rival power, has been accusing and condemning the PH air patrol of stirring trouble and disrupting order in the SCS, where it claims almost the entire area as its historical and sovereign territory, based on its controversial nine-dash line. China has also been building and militarizing artificial islands and structures in the SCS, to assert and consolidate its control and dominance, and to deter and intimidate other claimants and users.

China, through its foreign ministry and military, has warned and demanded the PH and the US to stop and withdraw their air patrols, which it considers as an infringement and a provocation of its sovereignty and security. China has also threatened and prepared to take all necessary measures to safeguard its interests and rights, and to maintain peace and stability in the SCS.

Keep Reading

The Implications of the PH Air Patrol for the SCS

The PH air patrol, and China’s response to it, have significant implications for the situation and the future of the SCS, such as:

• The escalation and risk of a conflict, which could be triggered by an accident, a miscalculation, or a confrontation, and which could involve the PH, China, the US, and other parties, such as Vietnam, Malaysia, and Brunei, who also have claims and interests in the SCS. A conflict in the SCS could be devastating and catastrophic for the region and the world, as it could affect the security, economy, and environment of the SCS, which is a vital and busy sea lane for trade, energy, and communication.
• The challenge and opportunity for a dialogue and a resolution, which could be facilitated and mediated by the existing and potential mechanisms and platforms, such as the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), the Code of Conduct (COC), and the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). A dialogue and a resolution in the SCS could be beneficial and constructive for the region and the world, as it could foster the cooperation and the trust among the stakeholders and the actors, and as it could uphold the rules and the norms that govern the SCS.