The ramifications of Taiwan’s sovereignty issue have unveiled the contrast between the freedoms of citizen elections and majority votes on national politics and the complexities of selecting the island’s constitutional and international status.
Referendums are longstanding public participatory tools used to resolve sovereignty disputes, however their perception of being a mechanism for resolving sovereignty disputes is restricted by legal requirements, constitutional restrictions and cross strait tension.
This provokes another significant doubt regarding the extent to which the direct democratic form could be taken when national identity and national security intersect.
Taiwan Referendum System Faces Constitutional Restrictions
The referendum system in Taiwan enables the people to vote on legislation and legislative principles, and on big public policies. A referendum calling for a radical transformation of the constitutional system, however, does not go the same way as a normal policy referendum.
When the legislative assembly meets, constitutional amendments necessitated by the meeting must be approved by a majority of the three-quarters of the legislators present. The proposal then needs to be approved by a majority of eligible voters, rather than just a majority of votes cast.
One of the reasons for this is that such a change in the Constitution is extremely difficult even if a political movement has such strong public support.
Taiwan Constitutional Amendment Rules Limit Popular Mandates
Unlike regular referendums, constitutional amendments are unable to prevent the lack of transparency of legislative procedures.The Hong Kong-style direct democracy is only limited in its application of constitutional amendment due to the difference with ordinary referendums.
The Referendum Act stipulates that the majority of the electorate must support the proposal on an affirmative vote for it to pass, with a majority necessary over a majority of the negative vote, and a minimum of one quarter of the electorate must affiliate with it.
The participation requirement is much higher for constitutional amendments. This was a challenge shown in the referendum previous to this, which was held in 2022 to reduce the voting age from 20 to 18.
Some 5.6 million people voted in favor of it, but the numbers were too low to make it a majority of the electorate. This demonstrated how a proposal can have greater pro support than anti support, and yet fail, legally.
Taiwan Cross Strait Status Complicates Sovereignty Questions
Sovereignty issues are inextricably intertwined with Taiwan’s ties with China. Beijing views Taiwan as part of its territory and is against Taiwan’s independence, while Taiwan has elected its own government and armed forces as well as has democratic institutions.
A separate initiative on the issue of independence or national status would thus carry more than just constitutional implications within the country. It might have an impact on cross-southern sea relations, security in the region and Taiwan’s foreign relations.
This geopolitical context adds further pressure on political leadership and leaders are required to manage visions and aspirations for the people while avoiding rising tensions. A referendum vote alone won’t necessarily solve problems of international recognition to say nothing of future security arrangements on the island.
Taiwan Democratic Legitimacy Requires Political Clarity
The referendum system in Taiwan should not be evaluated solely on the basis of its feasibility in bringing change to the constitutional status. However, thresholds can safeguard basic institutions from short-term choices in the course of a political shift, but the other side is that thresholds can limit the ability of constitutional processes to turn popular preferences into constitutional outcomes.
The problem is to keep providing safeguards, while keeping the involvement of democratic processes effective without appearing too ineffective. More public understanding on what different referendum questions are capable of is absolutely vital.
In the end, Taiwan has more important issues that demand a ballot: the Taiwan Strait sovereignty question requires transparency in constitutional processes, a fair public debate, and political leaders who are able to juggle domestic and international competing demands.
Recommended Reads
What Happened During Taiwan’s Gay Bar Raid?
What Services Does TECO’s Cebu Office Offer?
Which Wang Kai Dramas Should You Watch?
Why Is China Conducting Drills Near Taiwan?
Why Does Yonaguni Matter to Japan and Taiwan?
