(C): Twitter
During a press briefing this week, former President Donald Trump faced a pointed question: India had accused the U.S. of hypocrisy—criticizing New Delhi for buying Russian oil, while itself purchasing Russian uranium, fertilizers, and chemicals. Trump’s reply? A blunt: “I don’t know anything about it. I’d have to check.”
Trump’s comment came amid threats to raise U.S. tariffs “very substantially” on India—and potentially other countries—over their energy purchases from Russia. He claimed India was “fueling the war machine” in Ukraine by buying discounted Russian oil. Meanwhile, India’s Ministry of External Affairs criticized the U.S. and EU for double standards—pointing out that Washington continues to import from Russia essential goods like uranium hexafluoride, palladium for EVs, fertilizers, and industrial chemicals.
Data from recent years shows that the U.S. has continued substantial trade with Russia—even after the start of the Ukraine war. In 2024 alone, the U.S. imported fertilizer worth $1.27 billion and minerals like palladium and uranium valued in the hundreds of millions. India has used these figures to question the legitimacy of U.S. criticism toward its own energy decisions.
Read Also: Trump to substantially raise tariffs on Indian imports: India hits back
Trump’s uncertainty raised eyebrows, especially given the ongoing tariffs rhetoric and mounting tensions between Washington and New Delhi. The off‑hand comment underscores broader skepticism across many Asian capitals, where selective trade enforcement damages trust in Western leadership. The episode raises a key question: if trade principles are to be enforced globally, should they not apply to all nations—including the enforcers?
Trump indicated further decisions on tariffs are pending, with unspecified “meetings with Russia” coming soon. The exchange serves as a vivid reminder that in geopolitics, rhetoric and reality often diverge—and public inconsistencies can be costly.
As India and other global partners evaluate strategies in a contested world, Trump’s candid admission may well be remembered—not for what it revealed, but for what it failed to conceal.
A Market Catching Its Breath The Singapore market turned noticeably quieter after the Straits Times Index (STI) went down, reflecting…
In response to a sudden and highly visible spike in strategic naval operations, the attention of the world has been…
The fast naval build-up in the area of Taiwan and Japan is causing the tension of East Asia to be…
The future of Asia in 2026 has an excellent combination of both opportunities and risks: a fresh wave of IPO…
On a dining table, food from many different cultures may look the same, but that is not the case. After…
Asia Power Index 2025 reveals a significant change of the region of Asia, transforming the entire continent. While the struggle…
This website uses cookies.
Read More