Lawsuit alleges Apple and Amazon conspired to hike iPhone and iPad pricing.

Apple Inc. and Amazon.com Inc. were accused on Wednesday in an antitrust complaint of conspiring to increase iPhone and iPad pricing by banning practically all alternative resellers of new Apple products from Amazon’s website.

The proposed class action in federal court in Seattle challenged a deal that went into effect in January 2019, under which Apple gave Amazon discounts of up to 10 percent on its products in exchange for Amazon allowing only seven of 600 resellers to remain on its platform.

According to the complaint, this made Amazon the major reseller of new iPhones and iPads on its website, after it had previously carried a limited number of Apple devices as well as counterfeits.

According to the complaint, costs increased by more than 10%, but Apple maintained its retail prices. Once-common discounts of 20% or more are no longer the norm, the report stated.

The complaint stated, “Congress enacted antitrust statutes to prohibit the erection of entry obstacles to exclude rivals and the subsequent increase in prices following their elimination. The case is conclusive.”

Keep Reading

Apple and Amazon did not reply to demands for comment immediately. In the third quarter of this year, the combined product revenue of Cupertino, California-based Apple and Seattle-based Amazon exceeded $125 billion.

The lawsuit filed on Wednesday targets Americans who purchased new iPhones and iPads on Amazon since January 2019.

It demands specific triple damages, compensation, and an end to the alleged “collective boycott” by the corporations.

The stated plaintiff, Steven Floyd of Williamsport, Pennsylvania, alleged that he paid $319.99 for a new iPad he purchased from Amazon on the company’s website and was denied the opportunity to pay less due to Amazon’s suppression of competition.

A month ago, an Italian administrative court overturned a 173.3 million euro ($173.6 million) fine against Apple and Amazon for suspected price collusion imposed by Italy’s antitrust agency.

Floyd v. Amazon.com Inc. et al., No. 22-01599, US District Court, Western District of Washington.

Noto

Jakarta-based Newswriter for The Asian Affairs. A budding newswriter that always keep track of the latest trends and news that are happening in my country Indonesia.

Recent Posts

STI’s Sudden Slowdown: What Singapore’s Market Pullback Reveals About Global Risk Mood

A​‍​‌‍​‍‌​‍​‌‍​‍‌ Market Catching Its Breath The Singapore market turned noticeably quieter after the Straits Times Index (STI) went down, reflecting…

December 6, 2025

Waves of Power: Decoding China’s Bold Fleet Deployment Across East Asian Seas

In​‍​‌‍​‍‌​‍​‌‍​‍‌ response to a sudden and highly visible spike in strategic naval operations, the attention of the world has been…

December 5, 2025

Rising Regional Tensions: How Naval Build-Up Near Taiwan and Japan Is Reshaping East Asian Security

The fast naval build-up in the area of Taiwan and Japan is causing the tension of East Asia to be…

December 5, 2025

Shifting Investment Tides: Asia’s IPO Boom and the AI-Bubble Warning for 2026

The future of Asia in 2026 has an excellent combination of both opportunities and risks: a fresh wave of IPO…

December 5, 2025

When Hunger Has a Gender: Unpacking the Global Food Access Gap Women Face

On​‍​‌‍​‍‌​‍​‌‍​‍‌ a dining table, food from many different cultures may look the same, but that is not the case. After…

December 5, 2025

Asia Power Index 2025: Unmasking the Power Shifts in a US–China Dominated Region — And India’s Strategic Rise

Asia​‍​‌‍​‍‌​‍​‌‍​‍‌ Power Index 2025 reveals a significant change of the region of Asia, transforming the entire continent. While the struggle…

December 5, 2025

This website uses cookies.

Read More