Lawsuit alleges Apple and Amazon conspired to hike iPhone and iPad pricing.

Apple Inc. and Amazon.com Inc. were accused on Wednesday in an antitrust complaint of conspiring to increase iPhone and iPad pricing by banning practically all alternative resellers of new Apple products from Amazon’s website.

The proposed class action in federal court in Seattle challenged a deal that went into effect in January 2019, under which Apple gave Amazon discounts of up to 10 percent on its products in exchange for Amazon allowing only seven of 600 resellers to remain on its platform.

According to the complaint, this made Amazon the major reseller of new iPhones and iPads on its website, after it had previously carried a limited number of Apple devices as well as counterfeits.

According to the complaint, costs increased by more than 10%, but Apple maintained its retail prices. Once-common discounts of 20% or more are no longer the norm, the report stated.

The complaint stated, “Congress enacted antitrust statutes to prohibit the erection of entry obstacles to exclude rivals and the subsequent increase in prices following their elimination. The case is conclusive.”

Apple and Amazon did not reply to demands for comment immediately. In the third quarter of this year, the combined product revenue of Cupertino, California-based Apple and Seattle-based Amazon exceeded $125 billion.

The lawsuit filed on Wednesday targets Americans who purchased new iPhones and iPads on Amazon since January 2019.

It demands specific triple damages, compensation, and an end to the alleged “collective boycott” by the corporations.

The stated plaintiff, Steven Floyd of Williamsport, Pennsylvania, alleged that he paid $319.99 for a new iPad he purchased from Amazon on the company’s website and was denied the opportunity to pay less due to Amazon’s suppression of competition.

A month ago, an Italian administrative court overturned a 173.3 million euro ($173.6 million) fine against Apple and Amazon for suspected price collusion imposed by Italy’s antitrust agency.

Floyd v. Amazon.com Inc. et al., No. 22-01599, US District Court, Western District of Washington.

Noto

Jakarta-based Newswriter for The Asian Affairs. A budding newswriter that always keep track of the latest trends and news that are happening in my country Indonesia.

Recent Posts

Coventry vs Southampton Lineups, Odds & Betting Tips: Championship Clash March 14, 2026

Coventry City hosted Southampton at the Coventry Building Society Arena on Saturday, March 14, 2026, in an important Championship match.…

March 14, 2026

Disney Fireworks 2026: Magic Kingdom Showtime Changes Explained

Walt Disney World's Magic Kingdom fireworks are a nightly highlight. They attract crowds for the amazing Happily Ever After show.…

March 14, 2026

How Chen Lili Is Bringing Traditional Arts to the Spotlight in the 2026 Asian Film Awards

The Asian film awards has been one of the most coveted awards of Asian films that recognizes the artistry of…

March 14, 2026

The Rise of Antonelli: Is the 19-Year-Old Mercedes Driver the New Face of F1 2026?

In Formula One, a new star can be making its appearances. Andrea Kimi Antonelli is only 19 years old but…

March 14, 2026

The K-Drama Dream: Why Every Asian K-Drama Fan Is Watching Made in Korea on Netflix Today

In Asia, the term Made in Korea is the buzzword and it is streaming up the K-drama rankings. The new…

March 14, 2026

How to Book Celera Makati: Reservation Guide, Menu, Price & Review

Celera can be considered among the desired high-quality dining establishments in Makati in case you are going out to a…

March 14, 2026

This website uses cookies.

Read More