Lawsuit alleges Apple and Amazon conspired to hike iPhone and iPad pricing.

Apple Inc. and Amazon.com Inc. were accused on Wednesday in an antitrust complaint of conspiring to increase iPhone and iPad pricing by banning practically all alternative resellers of new Apple products from Amazon’s website.

The proposed class action in federal court in Seattle challenged a deal that went into effect in January 2019, under which Apple gave Amazon discounts of up to 10 percent on its products in exchange for Amazon allowing only seven of 600 resellers to remain on its platform.

According to the complaint, this made Amazon the major reseller of new iPhones and iPads on its website, after it had previously carried a limited number of Apple devices as well as counterfeits.

According to the complaint, costs increased by more than 10%, but Apple maintained its retail prices. Once-common discounts of 20% or more are no longer the norm, the report stated.

The complaint stated, “Congress enacted antitrust statutes to prohibit the erection of entry obstacles to exclude rivals and the subsequent increase in prices following their elimination. The case is conclusive.”

Apple and Amazon did not reply to demands for comment immediately. In the third quarter of this year, the combined product revenue of Cupertino, California-based Apple and Seattle-based Amazon exceeded $125 billion.

The lawsuit filed on Wednesday targets Americans who purchased new iPhones and iPads on Amazon since January 2019.

It demands specific triple damages, compensation, and an end to the alleged “collective boycott” by the corporations.

The stated plaintiff, Steven Floyd of Williamsport, Pennsylvania, alleged that he paid $319.99 for a new iPad he purchased from Amazon on the company’s website and was denied the opportunity to pay less due to Amazon’s suppression of competition.

A month ago, an Italian administrative court overturned a 173.3 million euro ($173.6 million) fine against Apple and Amazon for suspected price collusion imposed by Italy’s antitrust agency.

Floyd v. Amazon.com Inc. et al., No. 22-01599, US District Court, Western District of Washington.

Noto

Jakarta-based Newswriter for The Asian Affairs. A budding newswriter that always keep track of the latest trends and news that are happening in my country Indonesia.

Recent Posts

Is Girigo App Safe? Why Cyber Experts are Warning You to Delete This Viral App Immediately

The Girigo App is the latest buzz app that has caught on in social media today (April 30, 2026). It…

April 30, 2026

How to Claim the New ‘Anime Apocalypse’ Soul Shards Before May 1?

Roblox's virtual world is currently experiencing an "End of the World" event, but for the players of the wildly popular…

April 30, 2026

Friendster is Back? The Original Social Media Giant Returns After Years; Can You Still See Your 2005 Testimonials?

The internet has been caught unawares with the re-entry of Friendster. By April 30, 2026, the formerly-legendary social networking platform…

April 30, 2026

Let Your Bot Do the Shopping: Visa Launches ‘Agentic Ready’ Program in Asia Pacific Today; When Your AI Will Start Paying Your Bills for You

Visa has just initiated a significant change to digital payments with Visa officially launching its Agentic Ready program in the…

April 30, 2026

No More Nicknames: PayNow to End Alias Option for All Users in June; Why Your Payment Handle Must Match Your Legal Name

Singapore PayNow is a popular instant payment system. Retail users will cease to use custom nicknames to transact on June…

April 30, 2026

Planning a Thai Vacation? Why Travel Agents are Slamming the New B1,000 Exit Tax

Southeast Asia's tourism sector is being jolted this morning. In an effort to boost the Thai economy, the country's government…

April 29, 2026

This website uses cookies.

Read More