Bung Moktar did not seek the RM3.5 million fee for Felcra’s investment, says witness

Malaysia – Datuk Seri Bung Moktar Radin did not request an RM3.5 million commission from the investment agency to authorize the RM150 million investment in Public Mutual unit trust, according to the Sessions Court.

Madhi Abdul Hamid, a Public Mutual Berhad investment agent, stated in a meeting with the MP for Kinabatangan and many other persons at Hotel Intercontinental in the past, Jalan Ampang, that subjects pertaining to commission or payment of bribes to Bung Moktar were not mentioned.

In cross-examination by lawyer M., the 24th prosecution witness, who is also a pivotal witness in the case, remarked in the corruption trial of Bung Moktar and his wife Datin Seri Zizie Izette Abdul Samad before Judge Rozina Ayob, Athimulan is representing Bung Moktar.

Earlier, during the prosecution’s cross-examination, Madhi admitted that there were inconsistencies when he testified there was no demand for RM3.5 million commission from Bung Moktar despite the fact that his discussion with the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) in 2016 was recorded differently.

Related Posts

The court granted the prosecution’s plea to cross examine the witness on December 7 last year since he was regarded a hostile witness after his testimony in court disputed the discussion recorded when probed by MACC.

Madhi also agreed with Athimulan’s assertion that awarding Zizie Izette an RM2.2 million commission was standard procedure and had been given to other introducers.

The unit trust investment proposal was tabled in Felcra’s board of directors meeting, the witness said in response to another question.

During a re-examination by deputy public prosecutor Law Chin How, the witness stated that he was contacted and summoned by MACC numerous times for the investigation and have it recorded, and that there were also questions that he could not give answers to because he no longer remembers or that he was uncertain of the answer, as well as being unable to think clearly at the time. He explained that he was also confused by the scenario since, despite the fact that he had done nothing illegal, he was summoned multiple times to make statements, so he  felt pressured because he had never been summoned by any institution before.

Katherine S

1/4 German, 3/4 Malaysian. I write, follow and monitor closely political news happening in Malaysia, and other happening news in the ASEAN region. Newswriter for the best ASEAN news website - The Asian Affairs.

Recent Posts

STI’s Sudden Slowdown: What Singapore’s Market Pullback Reveals About Global Risk Mood

A​‍​‌‍​‍‌​‍​‌‍​‍‌ Market Catching Its Breath The Singapore market turned noticeably quieter after the Straits Times Index (STI) went down, reflecting…

December 6, 2025

Waves of Power: Decoding China’s Bold Fleet Deployment Across East Asian Seas

In​‍​‌‍​‍‌​‍​‌‍​‍‌ response to a sudden and highly visible spike in strategic naval operations, the attention of the world has been…

December 5, 2025

Rising Regional Tensions: How Naval Build-Up Near Taiwan and Japan Is Reshaping East Asian Security

The fast naval build-up in the area of Taiwan and Japan is causing the tension of East Asia to be…

December 5, 2025

Shifting Investment Tides: Asia’s IPO Boom and the AI-Bubble Warning for 2026

The future of Asia in 2026 has an excellent combination of both opportunities and risks: a fresh wave of IPO…

December 5, 2025

When Hunger Has a Gender: Unpacking the Global Food Access Gap Women Face

On​‍​‌‍​‍‌​‍​‌‍​‍‌ a dining table, food from many different cultures may look the same, but that is not the case. After…

December 5, 2025

Asia Power Index 2025: Unmasking the Power Shifts in a US–China Dominated Region — And India’s Strategic Rise

Asia​‍​‌‍​‍‌​‍​‌‍​‍‌ Power Index 2025 reveals a significant change of the region of Asia, transforming the entire continent. While the struggle…

December 5, 2025

This website uses cookies.

Read More